Spooty Biscuit wrote:make sure I can still get that fresh taste years down the road when my current hard drives start getting stale.
TEEX wrote:Spooty Biscuit wrote:make sure I can still get that fresh taste years down the road when my current hard drives start getting stale.
Nothing like the sweet taste of Chinese Tea, eh Spoot-head?
Phaiyte wrote:Top notch NEMO reply. There's literally 0 need to spend .5k on a single pair of jeans, unless it's from a tailor that weaves the fabric while sucking your dick at the same time. Even then I'm sort of a cheap ass(comparatively) and can find good clothes for less than 20% the price
Psychotik wrote:Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is ‘lossy’. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA – it’s about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.
Cat-Bomb wrote:internet arguments are like the special olympics, you may win but you are still retarded
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests